The Dutch government has recently reversed its decision to cut the number of flights at Schiphol Airport following objections from the United States and the European Union. The initial plan aimed to reduce noise pollution by implementing an experimental scheme, which included reducing flight numbers and night flights at the airport. However, concerns raised by the US and the European Commission regarding the lack of a "balanced approach" process led to the government's decision to back down.
The Controversy
In August, the Dutch government announced its intention to decrease the number of flights at Schiphol Airport from 500,000 to 452,500 per year by winter 2024. This reduction was part of an experimental scheme to address noise pollution concerns at the airport. Additionally, the plan aimed to cut the number of night flights and required the use of quieter aircraft during those hours. The goal was to achieve a 15% reduction in noise pollution.
Objections from the US and European Union
The objections raised by the US Department of Transportation and the European Commission centered around the failure to follow the "balanced approach" process. This process requires states to identify multiple measures to reduce noise pollution, consult all stakeholders, and only consider reducing aircraft movements if other noise reduction measures prove insufficient. The US viewed the planned reduction as unjust, discriminatory, and anti-competitive for airlines. The European Commission also expressed concerns about non-compliance with European regulations.
Government's Decision to Back Down
In response to the objections, Dutch Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management, Mark Harbers, announced that the government would suspend the flight cuts until the Supreme Court rules in the cassation procedure. This ruling is not expected until the second quarter of next year. Harbers also emphasized that the government would explore obtaining flight cuts through the balanced approach procedure.
Impact on Airlines and Industry
KLM, one of the major carriers operating at Schiphol Airport, welcomed the government's decision to suspend the experimental rule for next year. The airline expressed satisfaction with preventing potential retaliation and ensuring continued flights to the US. KLM highlighted its commitment to reducing noise emissions through fleet renewal and sustainable aviation fuel usage. The carrier has already achieved a 40% reduction in noise emissions since the 2000s.
Airlines for America, an industry association, expressed gratitude towards the US government for listening to their concerns and issuing a strong order outlining violations of the US-EU Air Transport Agreement. They believe these actions played a crucial role in persuading the Dutch government to reverse its decision.
Schiphol Airport's Perspective
While the Dutch government's reversal disappointed Schiphol Airport, they highlighted the importance of a night closure and other measures outlined in their eight-point plan to address noise pollution. The airport emphasized that local residents are now left without clarity or certainty regarding future actions.
Summary
The Dutch government's decision to backtrack on its plans to reduce flights at Schiphol Airport reflects the objections raised by the US and European Union regarding the lack of a balanced approach process. While this may provide temporary relief for airlines and industry associations, it also highlights the need for a careful legal process to address noise pollution concerns effectively. As Schiphol Airport continues to navigate these challenges, it remains crucial to prioritize measures that ensure sustainable and responsible aviation practices while considering local residents' well-being.
(This article is sourced from aircargonews.com and curated by Thetransporteronline24)
